Received: (qmail 81817 invoked by uid 501); 1 Mar 2002 08:26:38 -0000
Message-Id: <20020301082638.81816.qmail@apache.org>
Date: 1 Mar 2002 08:26:38 -0000
From: Josh Aas <josha@mac.com>
Reply-To: josha@mac.com
To: submit@bugz.apache.org
Subject: Files not explicitly referred to are not parsed for SSI calls.
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.110

>Number:         10001
>Category:       mod_include
>Synopsis:       Files not explicitly referred to are not parsed for SSI calls.
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    apache
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          duplicate
>Submitter-Id:   apache
>Arrival-Date:   Fri Mar 01 00:30:00 PST 2002
>Closed-Date:    Sun Mar 03 11:24:42 PST 2002
>Last-Modified:  Sun Mar 03 11:24:42 PST 2002
>Originator:     josha@mac.com
>Release:        2.0b32
>Organization:
>Environment:
Mac OS X 10.1.3 (Darwin). December 2001 Apple Developer tools.
>Description:
Given "bob.com"... If I request "http://bob.com/", the index.shtml file that is displayed is not parsed before being sent out. If I request "http://bob.com/index.shtml" it works fine. Any subdirectories that I put into the request path do not parse the index files unless I explicity refer to the file. I have messed with the config file for hours and read all the documentation I could find on the subject. I can't make it work for anything.
>How-To-Repeat:
Set up a new 2.0b32 web server. Set it up to use SSI on .shtml documents. Pretend the domain is "bob.com". If I request "http://bob.com/", the index.shtml file that is displayed is not parsed before being sent out. If I request "http://bob.com/index.shtml" it works fine. Any subdirectories that I put into the request path do not parse the index files unless I explicity refer to the file.
>Fix:
Nope. Is this related at all to whether or not you enable Indexes? Should it be?
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
Comment-Added-By: jerenkrantz
Comment-Added-When: Fri Mar  1 01:21:13 PST 2002
Comment-Added:
Yup, this is a legitimate bug and will be fixed before the
next release.

This is a duplicate of PR 9963.

Thanks,
Justin Erenkrantz
State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
State-Changed-By: slive
State-Changed-When: Sun Mar  3 11:24:42 PST 2002
State-Changed-Why:

It's a dupe, so mark it as such, close it, and continue tracking 
in the other report.
Class-Changed-From-To: sw-bug-duplicate
Class-Changed-By: slive
Class-Changed-When: Sun Mar  3 11:24:42 PST 2002
>Unformatted:
 [In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, you need]
 [to include <apbugs@Apache.Org> in the Cc line and make sure the]
 [subject line starts with the report component and number, with ]
 [or without any 'Re:' prefixes (such as "general/1098:" or      ]
 ["Re: general/1098:").  If the subject doesn't match this       ]
 [pattern, your message will be misfiled and ignored.  The       ]
 ["apbugs" address is not added to the Cc line of messages from  ]
 [the database automatically because of the potential for mail   ]
 [loops.  If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig-   ]
 [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request from a  ]
 [developer.  Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS!     ]