Received: (qmail 9348 invoked by uid 2012); 7 Mar 1998 20:18:58 -0000
Message-Id: <19980307201858.9347.qmail@hyperreal.org>
Date: 7 Mar 1998 20:18:58 -0000
From: Randy Weinstein <rw263@is7.NYU.EDU>
Reply-To: rw263@is7.NYU.EDU
To: apbugs@hyperreal.org
Subject: IndexOptions IconsAreLinks
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.2

>Number:         1922
>Category:       mod_autoindex
>Synopsis:       IndexOptions IconsAreLinks
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    apache
>State:          closed
>Class:          change-request
>Submitter-Id:   apache
>Arrival-Date:   Sat Mar  7 12:20:01 PST 1998
>Last-Modified:  Fri Mar 13 14:10:00 PST 1998
>Originator:     rw263@is7.NYU.EDU
>Organization:
>Release:        1.3
>Environment:
All
>Description:
Add an option in the .htaccess file to allow for border=0 in the anchor
tag if the IconsAreLinks is added as an IndexOption?
>How-To-Repeat:
N/A	
>Fix:

>Audit-Trail:
State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
State-Changed-By: marc
State-Changed-When: Fri Mar 13 11:26:02 PST 1998
State-Changed-Why:
We really don't want to go down the road of having 
zillions and zillions of options for all sorts of 
different ways of doing the HTML for the page.  What
may get done at some point in the future is the ability
to use a generic "template" where you can specify 
the entire layout yourself and have Apache fill in the
blanks with the file info.

From: Marc Slemko <marcs@znep.com>
To: Randy Jae Weinstein <rw263@is7.nyu.edu>
Cc: Apache bugs database <apbugs@apache.org>
Subject: Re: mod_autoindex/1922: IndexOptions IconsAreLinks
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 1998 14:57:31 -0700 (MST)

 On Fri, 13 Mar 1998, Randy Jae Weinstein wrote:
 
 > But Marc...
 > 
 > The autoindex it the only page where the user has no control over the
 > layout.  Rarely is a <pre></pre> format ideal for any time of page.  Using
 > a template to generate the autoindexing page seems like a superior idea.
 > No chance of reconsidering this option?  Even for Apache 2.0 or a later
 > version of apache 1.4+?  PLEASE??
 
 The option of allowing a template hasn't been closed; if someone writes
 it, it will get included.  However, 1.3 is in feature freeze right now so
 it probably wouldn't get in 1.3.  There is another PR in the database
 asking for a template that is probably suspended right now until 1.3 goes
 out.
 
 Note that anyone can code it themself as a separate module.
 
 > 
 > > Synopsis: IndexOptions IconsAreLinks
 > > 
 > > State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
 > > State-Changed-By: marc
 > > State-Changed-When: Fri Mar 13 11:26:02 PST 1998
 > > State-Changed-Why:
 > > We really don't want to go down the road of having 
 > > zillions and zillions of options for all sorts of 
 > > different ways of doing the HTML for the page.  What
 > > may get done at some point in the future is the ability
 > > to use a generic "template" where you can specify 
 > > the entire layout yourself and have Apache fill in the
 > > blanks with the file info.
 > 
 >                                                    Cheers,
 >  =|  __  __    T    |                              Randy Jae
 >  =| | ..\/. |   O  M |
 >   *--\ \/ /--* O  A |                                 Lehigh University
 >   |  / __ \    T  N |  Randy Jae Weinstein        NYU College of Dentistry
 >   | |_|  |_|   H    |  rw263@is7.NYU.EDU
 > --==>> http://Pages.NYU.EDU/~rw263/
 > 
 
>Unformatted:
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <apbugs@Apache.Org> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED.  This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]