From nobody@hyperreal.com Thu Mar 27 14:54:19 1997 Received: by taz.hyperreal.com (8.8.4/V2.0) id OAA07544; Thu, 27 Mar 1997 14:54:19 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199703272254.OAA07544@taz.hyperreal.com> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 14:54:19 -0800 (PST) From: Joseph Sloan Reply-To: jjs@c-me.com To: apbugs@hyperreal.com Subject: 40-50% performance decrease relative to apache 1.1.3 X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.2 >Number: 278 >Category: general >Synopsis: 40-50% performance decrease relative to apache 1.1.3 >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible: apache >State: closed >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: apache >Arrival-Date: Thu Mar 27 15:00:01 1997 >Last-Modified: Tue Apr 15 18:12:42 PDT 1997 >Originator: jjs@c-me.com >Organization: >Release: 1.2.x >Environment: Linux 2.0.29, Slackware 96 and RedHat 4.1 >Description: To my dismay, every version of 1.2 I have compiled and installed turns out to be 40-50% slower than 1.1.3 - I have been using the Zeusbench program as a benchmark - whether I use 1 connection or 100 concurrent connections, small files or large files, 1 request for the file or several hundred requests, whether I request keep-alive or not, 1.2.x clocks in 40-50% slower than 1.1.3. >How-To-Repeat: Simply download zeusbench from www.zeus.co.uk/products/server and compare apache 1.1 to 1.2 on any system >Fix: Not yet - I'm amazed that nobody's mentioned this earlie >Audit-Trail: State-Changed-From-To: open-feedback State-Changed-By: coar@decus.org State-Changed-When: Fri Apr 4 11:29:00 PST 1997 State-Changed-Why: What modules are you using? Is this with simple HTML files, or are you using SSI parsing? State-Changed-From-To: feedback-closed State-Changed-By: dgaudet State-Changed-When: Tue Apr 15 18:12:41 PDT 1997 State-Changed-Why: Joseph reports that 1.2b8 doesn't exhibit the same problems. Dean >Unformatted: