Received: (qmail 24334 invoked by uid 2012); 19 Oct 1998 15:03:12 -0000 Message-Id: <19981019150312.24333.qmail@hyperreal.org> Date: 19 Oct 1998 15:03:12 -0000 From: Zdenek Havelka Reply-To: zdenekh@pvt.net To: apbugs@hyperreal.org Subject: "FancyIndexing on" contra "Allow-override Indexes" X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.2 >Number: 3241 >Category: mod_autoindex >Synopsis: "FancyIndexing on" contra "Allow-override Indexes" >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: medium >Responsible: apache >State: closed >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: apache >Arrival-Date: Mon Oct 19 08:10:00 PDT 1998 >Closed-Date: Sun Jul 29 09:35:14 PDT 2001 >Last-Modified: Sun Jul 29 09:35:14 PDT 2001 >Originator: zdenekh@pvt.net >Release: 1.3.2 >Organization: >Environment: Debian Linux 2.0, gcc 2.7.2.3, Apache compiled with mod_ssl_2.0.12-1.3.2 + fast-cgi_2.0.17 + php_3.0.5 >Description: Hi, I need global FancyIndexing + AddDescriptions in local .htaccess files. I have "FancyIndexing on" in my srm.conf and use "AllowOverride Indexes" in access.conf - but "AllowOverride Indexes" unsets FancyIndexing. I tried to include "FancyIndexing on" both before and after "AllowOverride Indexes" in access.conf, but it still does not work properly. When I add "FancyIndexing on" into .htaccess, it works well. But I need to set this option recursive. When I use "AddDescriptions" in srm.conf, working good. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: State-Changed-From-To: open-feedback State-Changed-By: marc State-Changed-When: Mon Oct 19 08:36:04 PDT 1998 State-Changed-Why: Please upgrade to 1.3.3. If that doesn't help, please provide an exact example of the configuration you are trying to use to enable this. Comment-Added-By: coar Comment-Added-When: Mon Oct 19 11:03:01 PDT 1998 Comment-Added: Do you have any IndexOptions directives? If so, add "FancyIndexing" to them, and get rid of the separate "FancyIndexing On" directive(s) and see if that makes a difference. From: Rodent of Unusual Size To: Apache bug database Cc: Subject: Re: mod_autoindex/3241: "FancyIndexing on" contra "Allow-overrid Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 11:16:48 -0400 Zdenek Havelka wrote: > > Dne 19-Oct-98 coar@apache.org napsal(a): > > > Do you have any IndexOptions directives? If so, add > > "FancyIndexing" to them, and get rid of the separate > > "FancyIndexing On" directive(s) and see if that makes a > > difference. > > No difference between "FancyIndexing on" and "IndexOptions FancyIndexing". > When I use both together, no difference too. I tried to swap the order of > "AllowOverride Indexes" and "IndexOptions FancyIndexing", but it is still not > working. > > I have some binary applications based on ssl on my system (without sources), > depending on ssleay08, and mod_ssl for apache 1.3.3 depends on ssleay09. This > is why I use older apache version. OK, I will install both ssleay version and > preload older for binary apps, and try Apache 1.3.3 > > many thanks for your attention, > ---- > Zdenek Havelka > zdenekh@pvt.net From: Rodent of Unusual Size To: Apache bug database Cc: Subject: Re: mod_autoindex/3241: "FancyIndexing on" contra "Allow-overrid Date: Thu, 22 Oct 1998 17:45:04 -0400 Zdenek Havelka wrote: > > Dne 19-Oct-98 coar@apache.org napsal(a): > > > Do you have any IndexOptions directives? If so, add > > "FancyIndexing" to them, and get rid of the separate > > "FancyIndexing On" directive(s) and see if that makes a > > difference. > > No difference between "FancyIndexing on" and "IndexOptions FancyIndexing". > When I use both together, no difference too. I tried to swap the order of > "AllowOverride Indexes" and "IndexOptions FancyIndexing", but it is still not > working. > > I have some binary applications based on ssl on my system (without sources), > depending on ssleay08, and mod_ssl for apache 1.3.3 depends on ssleay09. This > is why I use older apache version. OK, I will install both ssleay version and > preload older for binary apps, and try Apache 1.3.3 > > many thanks for your attention, > ---- > Zdenek Havelka > zdenekh@pvt.net Comment-Added-By: coar Comment-Added-When: Wed May 24 12:48:39 PDT 2000 Comment-Added: [This is a standard response.] This Apache problem report has not been updated recently. Please reply to this message if you have any additional information about this issue, or if you have answers to any questions that have been posed to you. If there are no outstanding questions, please consider this a request to try to reproduce the problem with the latest software release, if one has been made since last contact. If we don't hear from you, this report will be closed. If you have information to add, BE SURE to reply to this message and include the apbugs@Apache.Org address so it will be attached to the problem report! State-Changed-From-To: feedback-closed State-Changed-By: wrowe State-Changed-When: Sun Jul 29 09:35:14 PDT 2001 State-Changed-Why: [This is a standard response.] No response from submitter, assuming issue has been resolved. >Unformatted: [In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ] [you need to include in the Cc line ] [and leave the subject line UNCHANGED. This is not done] [automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ] [If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request ] [from a developer. ] [Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ]