Received: (qmail 9828 invoked by uid 2012); 3 Nov 1998 01:52:26 -0000
Message-Id: <19981103015226.9827.qmail@hyperreal.org>
Date: 3 Nov 1998 01:52:26 -0000
From: Ryan Clifton <rclifton@snowcrash.org>
Reply-To: rclifton@snowcrash.org
To: apbugs@hyperreal.org
Subject: RedirectMatch and Redirect rewrite URLs differently
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.2

>Number:         3333
>Category:       mod_alias
>Synopsis:       RedirectMatch and Redirect rewrite URLs differently
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    apache
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          duplicate
>Submitter-Id:   apache
>Arrival-Date:   Mon Nov  2 19:10:00 PST 1998
>Closed-Date:    Sun May 06 12:40:58 PDT 2001
>Last-Modified:  Sun May 06 12:40:58 PDT 2001
>Originator:     rclifton@snowcrash.org
>Release:        1.3.1
>Organization:
>Environment:
Solaris 2.6 (and 2.5), apache 1.3.1, gcc
SunOS enterprise 5.6 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-4
>Description:
I am trying to user RedirectMatch to redirect to a servlet.  The config line looks like:

RedirectMatch ^/admin(.*)$ http://my.site.com/webj?func=y\&t=1$1

Apache is HTML encoding the '?' as %3f, which causes my servlet to be unable to parse the variable string.  (%3f designates specifically to not treat it as a parameter).

If I user Redirect the string is not HTML encodes (unfortunately I need reg-ex parsing or I wouldn't be writing this).

The following works correctly (the '?' is not encoded):

Redirect /admin http://my.site.com/webj?func=y&1

I read through all of the bug report and saw no mention of this, so I did not bother to upgrade from 1.3.1 to 1.3.3.
>How-To-Repeat:
Create two redirects:

Redirect /junk http://your.server.com/junk?x=1&y=2 (works)

final URL looks like : http://your.server.com/junk?x=1&y=2

RedirectMatch ^/junk2(.*) http://your.server.com/junk?x=1\&u=2$1 (encodes the '?')

final URL looks like: http://your.server.com/junk%3fx=1&u=2
>Fix:
RedirectMatch likely is doing an HTML encode unnecessarily.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
State-Changed-By: rbb
State-Changed-When: Sun May  6 12:40:58 PDT 2001
State-Changed-Why:
This bug is being tracked in PR 7503.  Please test the 
patch in that PR and let us know if it works for you.
Class-Changed-From-To: sw-bug-duplicate
Class-Changed-By: rbb
Class-Changed-When: Sun May  6 12:40:58 PDT 2001
>Unformatted:
[In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, ]
[you need to include <apbugs@Apache.Org> in the Cc line ]
[and leave the subject line UNCHANGED.  This is not done]
[automatically because of the potential for mail loops. ]
[If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig-   ]
[nored unless you are responding to an explicit request ]
[from a developer.                                      ]
[Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS!         ]