Received: (qmail 2417 invoked by uid 65534); 25 Jan 2000 01:28:16 -0000 Message-Id: <20000125012816.2416.qmail@locus.apache.org> Date: 25 Jan 2000 01:28:16 -0000 From: Russell McOrmond Reply-To: russell@linux.ca To: submit@bugz.apache.org Subject: Can the apache group include a mod_auth_gdbm in future releases? X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.110 >Number: 5637 >Category: mod_auth-any >Synopsis: Can the apache group include a mod_auth_gdbm in future releases? >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: medium >Responsible: apache >State: open >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: apache >Arrival-Date: Mon Jan 24 17:30:00 PST 2000 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: russell@linux.ca >Release: 1.3.x >Organization: apache >Environment: RedHat Linux >Description: I run a RedHat linux environment. I have been distributing a mod_auth_gdbm (a slightly patched mod_auth_dbm) in order to have a DBM method easily compiled on RedHat linux that is compatable with the DBM method use by mod_php3. While I can play with include files for mod_auth_ndbm, the safest way is to have a separate module. I can send the sources as a file attach, but the changes are trivial. Is this something that could be included in future releases for those who have gdbm on their systems? >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: [In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, you need] [to include in the Cc line and make sure the] [subject line starts with the report component and number, with ] [or without any 'Re:' prefixes (such as "general/1098:" or ] ["Re: general/1098:"). If the subject doesn't match this ] [pattern, your message will be misfiled and ignored. The ] ["apbugs" address is not added to the Cc line of messages from ] [the database automatically because of the potential for mail ] [loops. If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request from a ] [developer. Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ]