Received: (qmail 73082 invoked by uid 65534); 10 Apr 2000 23:40:46 -0000 Message-Id: <20000410234046.73081.qmail@locus.apache.org> Date: 10 Apr 2000 23:40:46 -0000 From: Drew Schatt Reply-To: schatt@schatt.com To: submit@bugz.apache.org Subject: htpasswd encrypted passwords can't be read on other platform X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.110 >Number: 5978 >Category: os-solaris >Synopsis: htpasswd encrypted passwords can't be read on other platform >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: medium >Responsible: apache >State: closed >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: support >Submitter-Id: apache >Arrival-Date: Mon Apr 10 16:50:00 PDT 2000 >Closed-Date: Fri Apr 14 15:47:50 PDT 2000 >Last-Modified: Fri Apr 14 15:47:50 PDT 2000 >Originator: schatt@schatt.com >Release: 1.3.12 >Organization: >Environment: SunOS rigel.schatt.com 5.8 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIi-Engine SunOS mira.schatt.com 5.7 Generic_106542-06 i86pc i386 i86pc >Description: Hi there- I was running my webserver (compiled with mod_php, mod_dbi, mod_perl) on Solaris for X86 (mira). I have a few password protected directories, and everything was working great. Then, due to load related issues, I decided to move to a different machine, one that was actually running the Sparc chip (rigel). The problem is that I can't seem to get that same .htpasswd file working under apache under rigel, it keeps failing to authenticate. >How-To-Repeat: connect to www.schatt.com/mp3 with the username of test and password of test. Then try connecting to www2.schatt.com/mp3 with the same username (test) and password (test). Access will fail, even though the exact same file is being used for the .htpasswd (shared directory over the network during changeover). >Fix: Is there any method of making the results of the htpasswd command platform independant? This would really help those of us who use whatever platforms we have lying around to do our webserving, based on whatevers fastest. >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: State-Changed-From-To: open-closed State-Changed-By: lars State-Changed-When: Fri Apr 14 15:47:49 PDT 2000 State-Changed-Why: Well, I've no experience with Solaris 8, but the system crypto routines are different there is nothing you can do. Class-Changed-From-To: sw-bug-support Class-Changed-By: lars Class-Changed-When: Fri Apr 14 15:47:49 PDT 2000 Severity-Changed-From-To: serious-non-critical Severity-Changed-By: lars Severity-Changed-When: Fri Apr 14 15:47:49 PDT 2000 >Unformatted: [In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, you need] [to include in the Cc line and make sure the] [subject line starts with the report component and number, with ] [or without any 'Re:' prefixes (such as "general/1098:" or ] ["Re: general/1098:"). If the subject doesn't match this ] [pattern, your message will be misfiled and ignored. The ] ["apbugs" address is not added to the Cc line of messages from ] [the database automatically because of the potential for mail ] [loops. If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request from a ] [developer. Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ]