Received: (qmail 25207 invoked by uid 501); 17 Apr 2000 09:12:49 -0000
Message-Id: <20000417091249.25206.qmail@locus.apache.org>
Date: 17 Apr 2000 09:12:49 -0000
From: Kai-Uwe Rommel <rommel@ars.de>
Reply-To: rommel@ars.de
To: submit@bugz.apache.org
Subject: Proxy Cache Garbage Collection did not work - I fixed it
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.110

>Number:         5997
>Category:       mod_proxy
>Synopsis:       Proxy Cache Garbage Collection did not work - I fixed it
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    apache
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   apache
>Arrival-Date:   Mon Apr 17 02:20:00 PDT 2000
>Closed-Date:    Wed Jun 14 22:25:48 PDT 2000
>Last-Modified:  Wed Jun 14 22:25:48 PDT 2000
>Originator:     rommel@ars.de
>Release:        1.3.12
>Organization:
>Environment:
Windows NT 4.0, SP5
>Description:
The Proxy Cache Garbage Collection did not work in the Win32 port.
I fixed it, I can send you the context diff on request.
I also have a fix for PR#4468, in case you are interested.
>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:
Send me an E-Mail and get the context diff mailed back. AND THEN INTEGRATE IT!
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:

From: "Kai-Uwe Rommel" <Rommel@ARS.de>
To: submit@bugz.apache.org, apache-bugdb@apache.org
Cc: postmaster@apache.org
Subject: Re: mod_proxy/5997: Proxy Cache Garbage Collection did not work - I fixed
 it
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 15:08:54 +0200

 submit@bugz.apache.org wrote on 17.4.2000 11:20:00:
 >
 > Thank you very much for your problem report.
 > It has the internal identification `mod_proxy/5997'.
 > The individual assigned to look at your
 > report is: apache.
 >
 > >Category:       mod_proxy
 > >Responsible:    apache
 > >Synopsis:       Proxy Cache Garbage Collection did not work - I fixed it
 > >Arrival-Date:   Mon Apr 17 02:20:00 PDT 2000
 
 Would someone please care to respond? Since I did not only report
 a bug but also FIXED it and offering you the fix, I would at least
 expect you to request that fix from me.
 
 What poor kind of service the Apache team has become ...
 
 Kai Uwe Rommel
 
 --
 /* Kai Uwe Rommel                   ARS Computer & Consulting GmbH *
  * rommel@ars.de (http://www.ars.de)             Muenchen, Germany *
  * rommel@leo.org (http://www.leo.org/pub/comp/os/os2 maintenance) */
 
 
State-Changed-From-To: open-closed
State-Changed-By: wrowe
State-Changed-When: Wed Jun 14 22:25:43 PDT 2000
State-Changed-Why:
This is a duplicate report.
The behavior you describe is fixed in the forthcoming 
release of Apache 1.3.13
>Unformatted:
 [In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, you need]
 [to include <apbugs@Apache.Org> in the Cc line and make sure the]
 [subject line starts with the report component and number, with ]
 [or without any 'Re:' prefixes (such as "general/1098:" or      ]
 ["Re: general/1098:").  If the subject doesn't match this       ]
 [pattern, your message will be misfiled and ignored.  The       ]
 ["apbugs" address is not added to the Cc line of messages from  ]
 [the database automatically because of the potential for mail   ]
 [loops.  If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig-   ]
 [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request from a  ]
 [developer.  Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS!     ]