Received: (qmail 66062 invoked by uid 501); 12 Jun 2000 12:36:30 -0000 Message-Id: <20000612123630.66061.qmail@locus.apache.org> Date: 12 Jun 2000 12:36:30 -0000 From: Aaron Lapikas Reply-To: alapikas@icubed.com To: submit@bugz.apache.org Subject: Compilation problems of suexec X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.110 >Number: 6177 >Category: suexec >Synopsis: Compilation problems of suexec >Confidential: no >Severity: critical >Priority: medium >Responsible: apache >State: closed >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: support >Submitter-Id: apache >Arrival-Date: Mon Jun 12 05:40:02 PDT 2000 >Closed-Date: Mon Nov 06 17:17:21 PST 2000 >Last-Modified: Mon Nov 06 17:17:21 PST 2000 >Originator: alapikas@icubed.com >Release: 2.0a4 >Organization: >Environment: Linux kernel release 2.3.99pre9, GCC compiler egcs-2.91.66. Slackware v7.0 distribution. uname output: ------------------------------------- Linux aaron 2.3.99-pre9 #2 SMP Wed May 31 10:30:45 EDT 2000 i686 unknown ------------------------------------- >Description: When compiling suexec, errors occurred. Specifically: 1) the compiler was looking for the header file /usr/local/include/apr.h and could not find it. My solution was to link /usr/local/include/apr/apr.h to /usr/local/include/apr.h. 2) the compiler has looking for the file stream stderr and it was an undefined symbol. My solution was to add the line '#include ' to the file suexec.c 3) the compiler was returning errors involving errno. My solution was to add the line '#include ' to suexec.c I do not know whether these compilation errors are specific to my distribution, or whether they are just code errors with the new beta version of apache. >How-To-Repeat: Install the Slackware v7.0 distribution of Linux and try to compile suexec via the command 'make suexec' from the src/support directory. >Fix: See above. >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: State-Changed-From-To: open-analyzed State-Changed-By: abagchi State-Changed-When: Tue Jun 20 11:19:08 PDT 2000 State-Changed-Why: Suexec has not been re-implemented for Apache 2.0 yet. There is an outstanding patch to make suexec work with 2.0, but it is still being reviewed. Please look for Suexec functionality to be added in a future alpha version of 2.0. Thank you for your bug report. State-Changed-From-To: analyzed-closed State-Changed-By: rbb State-Changed-When: Mon Nov 6 17:17:21 PST 2000 State-Changed-Why: Suexec has been implemented in the CVS tree, so this should work now. Please try with either the latest CVS or the next alpha release >Unformatted: [In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, you need] [to include in the Cc line and make sure the] [subject line starts with the report component and number, with ] [or without any 'Re:' prefixes (such as "general/1098:" or ] ["Re: general/1098:"). If the subject doesn't match this ] [pattern, your message will be misfiled and ignored. The ] ["apbugs" address is not added to the Cc line of messages from ] [the database automatically because of the potential for mail ] [loops. If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request from a ] [developer. Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ]