Received: (qmail 42969 invoked by uid 501); 16 Dec 2000 19:22:43 -0000 Message-Id: <20001216192243.42968.qmail@locus.apache.org> Date: 16 Dec 2000 19:22:43 -0000 From: Ingo "Lütkebohle" Reply-To: ingo@blank.pages.de To: submit@bugz.apache.org Subject: DNS interaction for virtual hosts X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.110 >Number: 6988 >Category: documentation >Synopsis: DNS interaction for virtual hosts >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: medium >Responsible: apache >State: closed >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: apache >Arrival-Date: Sat Dec 16 11:30:02 PST 2000 >Closed-Date: Wed Aug 22 16:03:32 PDT 2001 >Last-Modified: Wed Aug 22 16:03:32 PDT 2001 >Originator: ingo@blank.pages.de >Release: 1.3 >Organization: >Environment: apache 1.3, its a documentation issue >Description: The old default configuration contained a big notice that just adding VirtualHosts does *not* work, they have to be in the DNS. The otherwise great new VirtualHost documentation does no longer contain such a notice. Please put it back in. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: Usefull information might be a hint on how to check if the name exists ("nslookup " or "host ") and an explanation of the output and how the DNS hostmaster can be contacted (i.e. "host -t soa ", pick out the e-mail address from the SOA line, etc.). >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: State-Changed-From-To: open-feedback State-Changed-By: fanf State-Changed-When: Wed Jan 3 18:52:22 PST 2001 State-Changed-Why: Please be more explicit. Which file are you talking about? In which version of Apache was the notice you talk about removed? State-Changed-From-To: feedback-closed State-Changed-By: slive State-Changed-When: Wed Mar 21 22:42:29 PST 2001 State-Changed-Why: [This is a standard response.] No response from submitter, assuming issue has been resolved. From: Ingo Luetkebohle To: slive@apache.org Cc: apbugs@apache.org Subject: Re: documentation/6988: DNS interaction for virtual hosts Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 17:40:15 +0100 On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 06:42:29AM -0000, slive@apache.org wrote: > No response from submitter, assuming issue has been resolved. Uh, no. I just now noticed that you had asked back once (filtering by thread in a large mailbox can be a disadvantage sometimes). Is further information still required? -- Ingo Luetkebohle / ingo@blank.pages.de / 95428014 / | Student of Computational Linguistics & Computer Science; | Fargonauten.DE sysadmin; Gimp Registry maintainer; | FP: 3187 4DEC 47E6 1B1E 6F4F 57D4 CD90 C164 34AD CE5B From: Ingo Luetkebohle To: apbugs@apache.org Cc: Subject: documentation/6988 file Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 17:53:09 +0100 The file I was talking about is httpd.conf-dist State-Changed-From-To: closed-open State-Changed-By: slive State-Changed-When: Thu Mar 22 18:12:32 PST 2001 State-Changed-Why: Additional information provided by user. State-Changed-From-To: open-closed State-Changed-By: slive State-Changed-When: Wed Aug 22 16:03:32 PDT 2001 State-Changed-Why: I think I'm going to declare this a "basic DNS" fact that we expect people to know. We want to keep the configuration file from becoming too overloaded. Thanks for using Apache! >Unformatted: [In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, you need] [to include in the Cc line and make sure the] [subject line starts with the report component and number, with ] [or without any 'Re:' prefixes (such as "general/1098:" or ] ["Re: general/1098:"). If the subject doesn't match this ] [pattern, your message will be misfiled and ignored. The ] ["apbugs" address is not added to the Cc line of messages from ] [the database automatically because of the potential for mail ] [loops. If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request from a ] [developer. Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ]