Received: (qmail 99711 invoked by uid 501); 1 Aug 2001 07:22:40 -0000 Message-Id: <20010801072240.99710.qmail@apache.org> Date: 1 Aug 2001 07:22:40 -0000 From: Peter Bieringer Reply-To: pb@bieringer.de To: submit@bugz.apache.org Subject: Multiviews don't work with shtml X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.110 >Number: 8112 >Category: mod_include >Synopsis: Multiviews don't work with shtml >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: medium >Responsible: apache >State: closed >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: apache >Arrival-Date: Wed Aug 01 00:30:00 PDT 2001 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: Thu Sep 20 22:04:13 PDT 2001 >Originator: pb@bieringer.de >Release: 2.0.16 >Organization: >Environment: RHL 6.2, Kernel 2.2.19 >Description: Looks like there is a bug. Config: DirectoryIndex index.shtml Dir: index.html.de index.html.en index.shtml.de index.shtml.en ipv6info.shtml.de ipv6info.shtml.en Try: http://ipv6.aerasec.de/ No index page is shown BTW: do you know when the XBitHack is fixed? >How-To-Repeat: http://ipv6.aerasec.de/ >Fix: No >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: Comment-Added-By: aaron Comment-Added-When: Wed Aug 1 22:29:31 PDT 2001 Comment-Added: As an answer to your question about xbithack, this has just been re-enabled in Apache 2.0. I have not looked into the other PR in this PR. State-Changed-From-To: open-closed State-Changed-By: wrowe State-Changed-When: Thu Aug 30 11:50:17 PDT 2001 State-Changed-Why: This entire class of mod_includes issues have been resolved in the most current cvs tree, and will be incorporated in the next alpha release (2.0.25 or later). Comment-Added-By: wrowe Comment-Added-When: Thu Sep 20 22:04:13 PDT 2001 Comment-Added: One last note - autoindex/negotation/mime modules were all recently overhauled (.24, IIRC) so the several issues in this PR should all be resolved Please let us know if you can reproduce from the current tree, or the next (.26 or higher) release. >Unformatted: [In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, you need] [to include in the Cc line and make sure the] [subject line starts with the report component and number, with ] [or without any 'Re:' prefixes (such as "general/1098:" or ] ["Re: general/1098:"). If the subject doesn't match this ] [pattern, your message will be misfiled and ignored. The ] ["apbugs" address is not added to the Cc line of messages from ] [the database automatically because of the potential for mail ] [loops. If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig- ] [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request from a ] [developer. Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS! ]