Received: (qmail 42581 invoked by uid 501); 5 Jan 2002 05:55:07 -0000
Message-Id: <20020105055507.42580.qmail@apache.org>
Date: 5 Jan 2002 05:55:07 -0000
From: Justin Rovang <jesusfreak@inbox.as>
Reply-To: jesusfreak@inbox.as
To: submit@bugz.apache.org
Subject: Image size Restriction
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.110

>Number:         9374
>Category:       config
>Synopsis:       Image size Restriction
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    apache
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   apache
>Arrival-Date:   Fri Jan 04 22:00:01 PST 2002
>Closed-Date:    Thu Apr 04 21:03:32 PST 2002
>Last-Modified:  Thu Apr 04 21:03:32 PST 2002
>Originator:     jesusfreak@inbox.as
>Release:        2.0
>Organization:
>Environment:
OS: Win98
>Description:
My images seem to have a size restriction on them, if it is more than 10Kb or so, the image shows up as the red [X] image. 
is this a config problem? or a prob with the Software? PLEASE HELP.
>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
State-Changed-From-To: open-feedback
State-Changed-By: wrowe
State-Changed-When: Fri Jan  4 23:38:15 PST 2002
State-Changed-Why:
Pretty scanty detail of what Apache version you are trying.  We are 
developing the 2.0.30 release, forthcoming.  The last release was .28,
so I will guess you are there.  Several known bugs in Win9x ports, and
several that haven't been debugged just yet (may be fixed in .30, and
then again, may not.)

We don't have many Win9x hackers contributing to the project, and much 
of the Windows hackers' efforts have been in optimizing the Windows NT port.
Sorry, but that is the nature of open source development, and we always
entertain patches that resolve bugs when users identify the invalid source 
code and come up with a fix.

Anyways, there are several patches to 2.0.30 that already solve some
very detailed bug reports for Windows 9x, and more being researched,
so please try out version .30 when it's released, and continue to use
Apache 1.3.22 on Windows 9x for production.

Thanks for participating in the Apache 2.0 Beta!

State-Changed-From-To: feedback-closed
State-Changed-By: wrowe
State-Changed-When: Thu Apr  4 21:03:32 PST 2002
State-Changed-Why:
Without further feedback we can't help much.

However, a significant bug was discovered in files that
spanned 8kb ... depending on circumstance the seek function
was not repositioning the file pointer correctly.  That could
explain your problem.

That bug is fixed in the forthcoming 2.0.34.  Thanks for
trying the Apache 2.0 Beta!

>Unformatted:
 [In order for any reply to be added to the PR database, you need]
 [to include <apbugs@Apache.Org> in the Cc line and make sure the]
 [subject line starts with the report component and number, with ]
 [or without any 'Re:' prefixes (such as "general/1098:" or      ]
 ["Re: general/1098:").  If the subject doesn't match this       ]
 [pattern, your message will be misfiled and ignored.  The       ]
 ["apbugs" address is not added to the Cc line of messages from  ]
 [the database automatically because of the potential for mail   ]
 [loops.  If you do not include this Cc, your reply may be ig-   ]
 [nored unless you are responding to an explicit request from a  ]
 [developer.  Reply only with text; DO NOT SEND ATTACHMENTS!     ]